Please take a moment to complete this survey below
Library's collection Library's IT development CancelTechnology especially websites plays an important role in people’s lives. Educators have been using them to improve their instructions in teaching and learning process. This study is conducted to find out the extent to which English Club and Activities for ESL Students meet the website evaluation framework as proposed by Hasan and Abuelrub (2011) and the similarities and differences between both of them. This study is supported by websites evaluation framework proposed by Hasan and Abuelrub (2011). In content quality, English Club met 76.25% of it; while Activities for ESL Students met 72.50% of it.In design quality, English club met 78.75% of it; while Activities for ESL students met 81.25% of it.In organization quality, English Club met 80.55% of it; while Activities for ESL students met 83.33% of it.In user friendly quality, English club met 83.82% of it; while Activities for ESL students met 85.29% of it. Overall the writer found that Activities for ESL Students met 79.92% of the website evaluation criteria with 211 of the total score; while English Club met 79.54% of the website evaluation criteria with 210 of the total score. Both English Club and Activities for ESL Student sare good websites for those who learn ESL/EFL.