Communication model produced by every communication performer was
varied. The differences were naturally caused by frame of references and fields of
experiences. And if we pulled it further backwards, actually differences of frame of
references and fields of experiences were results of varied cultures of every person.
Culture was a concept that resurrected interests. Formally, culture could be defined
as a comprehensive pattern. (Mulyana and Rahmat, 2002, h. 26).
Cultures appear in language patterns take form of activities and behaviors
that function as models for actions of self -adjustment and communication style that
enable people live in any particular society in any particular geographical
environment at any particular technical development extent and at any particular
time.
Communication and inter -cultural relations are reciprocal and influenced by
each other. What we discuss about, how we talk about it, what we care and neglect,
what we think about and how we think about it affected by culture. Ultimately, what
we talk about and how we talk about it, and what we see contribute to establish,
determine and resurrect our cultures. Cultures will not survive without
communication, nor will the other way around. Each of them can not change without
causing changes of others. (Mulyana and Rakmat, 2002 h.37).

Creator(s)

• IMANUEL VIRGINI OLAGA NATALIA

Contributor(s)

-

Publisher

Universitas Kristen Petra; 2007

Language

Indonesian

Category

jou – Journal

Sub Category

-

Source

Jurnal Ilmiah SCRIPTURA, Vol. I No.1 Januari 2007; Imanuel Virgini Olaga Natalia (NA00000462)

Subject(s)

• COMMUNICATION-CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES
• COMMUNICATION
• INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION

File(s)

• jiunkpe-ns-jou-2007-na00000462-8667-antarbudaya-resource1.pdf