Please take a moment to complete this survey below
Library's collection Library's IT development CancelCommunication is essential for human in daily life to interact with people. In reality,
people communicate each other to describe what they need and their intention.
Comprehension, involving interpretation of meaning, is so vital that communication
process succeeds. To interpret in this case is to read the unwritten conversation, and is
thus open to misreading. Reading a conversation, although it is not written, may be
possible because people having a conversation are at the same time analyzing the
objects of the communication, and therefore they become the producers of a text.
From this viewpoint, the act of interpreting the meaning of conversation in some
ways is similar to the act of reading, since the main objective of those activities is to
obtain the truth commonly considered as the intended meaning of the conversation.
The discussion of this thesis mainly emphasizes on the causes of the characters?
communication failures. To analyze the problem, I use literary approach considering
the text as the context of discussion and use Paul de Man?s theory of misreading, a
concept on nonverbal communication as well as the paradigms of verbal
communication. Those theory and concepts are prominent to indicate the factors of
communication failure. In the end of this study, I come to a conclusion that there are
two major factors that lead to the characters? communication failures. First, the fact
that the characters fail to interpret sign and symbol may cause communication
failures. Second, the incompatibility between the intended meaning and the perceived
meaning becomes the other cause of communication failure.